ASBCA Confirms That It Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Fraud-Based Defenses
The Federal Circuit’s holding in Laguna Construction Co. v. Carter seemed, when the case was decided in 2016, to scale back the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals’ (“ASBCA”) jurisdiction to entertain fraud-related defenses. 828 F.3d 1364. In that case, the government asserted a defense that Laguna could not recover in its claims because several of the company’s officials had pled guilty to a kickback scheme involving those contracts. The ASBCA found in the Government’s favor, relying on the guilty . . . Read More
Pre-Award Notifications in a Set-Aside Procurement: Can I Get a Debriefing Now?
If you pursue contracts that are set aside for small businesses, you have probably noticed that if your proposal is not successful, you will get what is called a “pre-award” notification from the agency informing you of the identity of “apparently successful offeror.” If you receive such a notice, you may be eager to get a debriefing to find out why your company was not identified as the “apparently successful offeror.” However, receiving a pre-award notification on a set-aside contract . . . Read More
HUBZone Definition of “Employee” Not So Black-and-White
In a recent decision, HUBZone Appeal of Q Services, Inc., the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) clarified that the number of hours worked by a person does not bar SBA from examining the totality of the circumstances to determine whether that individual qualifies as an employee for HUBZone program eligibility purposes. Under SBA’s HUBZone regulations, if a person works a minimum of 40 hours per month (whether employed on a full-time, part-time, or other basis), that individual will be treated as . . . Read More
Other Transaction Authority: What Is It and How Can I Get It?
If you followed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (“FY 2018 NDAA”) or the recent cloud computing award to REAN Cloud, you likely heard the term “other transaction authority,” but may have wondered what it means. The term is an invention of lawmakers to give the U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”) maximum flexibility in obtaining innovation without the trappings of traditional procurements. Contractors looking to take advantage of “other transaction authority” or “OTA” need to know some . . . Read More
The Risk of Certifying as Small Without Tax Returns
We are regularly contacted at this time of year, before tax returns are due, by companies that wish to pursue small business set-aside contracts but have not yet filed their tax returns. These inquiries stem from the belief by some firms that, because their tax returns have not been completed, they may still self-certify as a small business while knowing, or suspecting, that their immediate, prior year revenues make them large. This misunderstanding of the size regulations can have dire . . . Read More
Do Millennials Pose a Retention Risk?
According to GAO, it’s reasonable for agencies to consider it in evaluating quotes. The topic of millennials in the workforce is no stranger to anyone in the working world. A plethora of articles, blogs, reports, polls, and studies have been devoted to the subject. Companies and a countless other number of people (including millennials) have debated the subject for years, and will likely continue to do so. This is especially true when it comes to how quickly (whether perceived or . . . Read More
VA Amends Rules on Price Adjustments, Comments on Its Use of the Vets First Authority and Cascading Set-Asides
On February 21, 2018, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) issued final rules to amend its regulations that pertain to Economic Price Adjustment clauses for firm-fixed-price contracts, identifying VA’s Task-Order and Delivery-Order Ombudsman; clarifying the nature and use of consignment agreements; adding policy coverage on bond premium adjustments and insurance under fixed-price contracts; and providing for indemnification of contractors for medical research or development contracts. These final rules adopt the proposed rule published on March 13, 2017, and will . . . Read More
LGBTQ Discrimination Claims Under Title VII Likely to Increase in 2018 After Second Circuit Ruling
This week, the New York-based United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit became only the second federal appellate court to rule that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of an employee’s sexual orientation. The Second Circuit’s decision in Zarda v. Altitude Express is only binding on employers in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. However, given the court’s influence and the changing tides on the issue, we anticipate the decision . . . Read More
SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals Clarifies the (Not So Obvious) Effect of Size and Status Recertifications
In a recent case with wide-ranging implications, the Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) confirmed the broad nature of SBA’s general rule that a contractor maintains its size and socio-economic status for the life of a contract. See In the Matter of Analytic Strategies, Inc., SBA No. VET-268 (Jan. 29, 2018) . As a quick primer, SBA regulations provide that, where a concern represented itself and qualified as small and/or for a certain socio-economic status (e.g., SDVOSB, HUBZone, EDWOSB/WOSB) at the time of its initial offer, it maintains that . . . Read More
Review of NAICS Codes Assignments Reveals Inconsistencies and Small Percentage of Successful Appeals
The U.S. Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) has released a report on its review of several issues related to the North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) codes. Although it found that there are some inconsistencies in the assignment of NAICS codes – and thus size standards – for substantively similar procurements, only about 20 percent of NAICS codes appeals are successful. This is likely due to the fact that, in order to win a NAICS code appeal, an appellant must demonstrate . . . Read More