Government Asking for More Transparency on Federal Contracts Over 150K
By Dana Livne and John Shoraka For years the federal government has attempted to increase transparency in the federal marketplace and last month, U.S. Senators Claire McCaskill (D-MO) and Jon Tester (D-MT) introduced a bill that would require the posting online of the exact details of all government contracts worth $150,000 or more. The bill, “Contractor Accountability and Transparency Act of 2017”, seeks to implement a “machine-readable, searchable copy of each covered contract entered into by a Federal agency”. If the . . . Read More
4th Circuit Sets Forth Test for Determining What Constitutes “Joint Employer” for FLSA Purposes
In a pair of recent cases, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit (which hears appeals from the federal courts of Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina) has set forth what will hereafter be the applicable test in those jurisdictions when determining whether two or more entities constitute “joint employers” for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA” or “the Act”). The FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq., requires employers covered by the Act . . . Read More
What Every Contractor Should Know About Requests for Equitable Adjustment
By Michelle Litteken Government contractors quickly learn to expect the unexpected. While working on a construction contract, a contractor may encounter undisclosed utility lines 15 feet underground. Or, an information technology support contractor may be asked to comply with heightened security requirements without being given a contract modification. These changes increase the cost of performance and can put a small business in a precarious position. In situations like this, many contractors file a request for equitable adjustment (“REA”), seeking additional . . . Read More
Seventh Circuit Rules That Sexual Orientation is a Protected Class Under Title VII
On April 4, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that a part-time math instructor at Ivy Tech Community College in Indiana could sue her former employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for failing to promote, then terminating, her because she is a lesbian. Title VII protects an individual from discrimination in employment based on that individual’s “race, color, sex, or national origin,” but it does not specifically delineate that . . . Read More
Three Ways to Resolve Your Business Dispute
Presented by Paul Mengel and Ambi Biggs Click here to view the recorded session.
CVE Extends Verification Eligibility Period: What This Means for VOSBs
Last week, the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) final rule extending the eligibility period for participation in the VA VetBiz Vendor Information Pages (“VIP”) Program took effect. The final rule extends the verification eligibility period from two to three years. For those service-disabled-veteran-owned small businesses and veteran-owned small businesses (“VOSBs”) wondering what they need to do to take advantage of an additional 12 months of eligibility, the answer is nothing. All VOSBs listed in the VIP database as of March . . . Read More
Financing Growth for Federal Government Contractors
Presented by John Shoraka, Managing Director of PilieroMazza Advisory Services, Mike de Gennaro with PilieroMazza PLLC, and Patrick Kelley and Eric Rabinovich of Live Oak Bank.
Understanding the Extended Surviving Spousal Protections for SDVOSBs
By Marc Langston A surviving spouse, who is not a Service-Disabled Veteran, must satisfy specific criteria in order to continue running a company as though it remained a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (“SDVOSB”). This right is not automatic, and failure to meet the eligibility criteria will prevent a surviving spouse from being able to run the decedent’s company as a SDVOSB. It is important to consider that there are two separate SDVOSB set-aside programs. The older program, the Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned . . . Read More
The Weekly Update March 24, 2017
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Small Business Investment Companies: Passive Business Expansion and Technical Clarifications The delayed effective date for SBA’s final rule on Passive Business Expansion and Technical Clarifications occurred on March 21, 2017, when SBA re-opened the rule for additional public comments. SBA requires additional time to consider this final rule and determine whether any further changes are required. This final rule will go into effect on May 20, 2017. 82 Fed. Reg. 14428 GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation (“HSAR”) – Extension of . . . Read More
GAO Reports On Government Contracting Trends
On March 8, 2017, GAO issued a report on government contracting trends from fiscal year (“FY”) 2011 through FY 2015. FY 2015 was the latest year for which there was complete data available at the time of GAO’s review. Using data from the Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation, GAO tabulated statistics which will be of interest to government contractors. Discussed below are some of GAO’s findings. First, in FY 2015, federal agencies procured $438 billion in products and services. This . . . Read More